Before you begin, create a dataset with validation rows and add every fine-tune or provider model you want to compare.
1
Open the dataset's Evaluate tab
Select New evaluation, choose Head to Head, and give the evaluation a descriptive name.
2
Choose the reference
Select original or relabeled dataset output as the primary participant. Candidates will be scored against this desired behavior.
3
Add candidate models
Add fine-tunes from the dataset first, then any base or provider models you want to compare. Fine-tunes are grouped by base model in the selector.
4
Configure the judge
Select a capable judge model and write instructions that define what a better answer means for this task. Start with 200 validation rows when enough are available.
5
Run and inspect
Start the evaluation. Scores update while rows finish. Open individual rows to read the judge explanation and use the failure indicator to inspect provider or parsing errors.
6
Decide whether to deploy
A 50% score means parity with the reference: wins count as 1, ties as 0.5, and losses as 0. Promote only after the completed score and per-row behavior meet your threshold.
API: Create an evaluation (POST /evals)
API: Create an evaluation (POST /evals)
The first participant is the primary. Replace the candidate model reference with the artifact or provider model you want to evaluate:The response contains the evaluation ID. Poll
GET /evals/{evalId} until the evaluation settles; see Create an evaluation.